Keeping Your Crew Through the Slow Season Is Costing You

The reason most shop owners don't run the slow-season numbers isn't laziness. It's that putting a guy's name next to a weekly burn number feels like you're deciding something about him as a person. So you don't do it. You keep him on. You tell yourself it'll shake out in March.

That's how good shops go under.

Loyalty is not a payroll policy. The second you treat it like one, you're spending money you don't have on a feeling you can't afford. The only people who get hurt when the account runs out are the guys you were trying to protect.

---

The Math You're Not Doing

Here's the question I want you to answer right now.

If all new work stopped today — no new calls, nothing — how long could you make payroll, cover your truck notes, and keep the lights on?

If you can't answer that in ten seconds, you've got a feeling and a prayer. Those don't show up as a positive balance on the fifteenth.

In October 2008, two of my builder accounts went dark in the same week. I found out my answer was about 38 days. I had six trucks and twelve men and I thought I was running a real business. I was running a cash flow gamble dressed up in work boots.

I'd been measuring success in trucks. After that October I measured it in weeks I could survive with no new dollar coming in. Carrying an underutilized body through a slow season eats directly into that number. It's not loyalty. It's a withdrawal from a reserve you haven't fully counted.

---

What "Keeping Him On" Actually Costs Per Week

Here's the number owners avoid.

A guy at $28 an hour isn't what he costs you. Stack employer payroll taxes, workers' comp — in Massachusetts on plumbing and HVAC work I was running real premiums, not estimates — general liability allocated per head, health insurance if you're covering any of it, and the actual operating cost of running his truck. Not the truck payment. Fuel, insurance per vehicle, wear. When I ran my own loaded numbers back at Smith Mechanical, a $28-an-hour guy was landing closer to $42 to $45 all-in. Call it $1,700 to $1,800 a week at 40 hours.

Now: how many billable hours did he actually generate in January?

If the T&M calls are dried up and you've got him doing shop inventory Tuesday and running a parts run to Ferguson Thursday because there's nothing else, the honest answer might be 12 to 16 real billable hours. The rest is paid standby. That's maybe $600 in revenue against $1,800 in cost.

I know what that gap looks like over eight weeks. I lived it.

---

The Lie: "I'll Make It Up in Spring"

Sometimes January's slow, February's slow, March the phones come back. Sometimes that's true.

But the money you burned in January and February is gone by the time March arrives. You can make up revenue. You cannot make up weeks of reserve you already spent.

In 2009 my receivables stretched from 45 days out to over 110. I was owed money — real jobs, completed work — I just couldn't get to it. While I waited on checks from builders playing their usual games, payroll came every two weeks like it had no idea what was happening outside.

That's the situation a lot of small shops are in all winter. A GC who's owed you since December — 60 days, 75 days, "check's in the mail," next Friday, you know the rhythm — and meanwhile you're carrying a guy on the bench because cutting him feels like failure. You're funding two problems out of one account that's getting smaller every week. The slow season doesn't wait for your collection problems to clear. Both run at the same time.

---

Loyalty Isn't the Problem. Vagueness Is.

The shops that die from slow-season carry costs aren't more loyal than the ones that survive. They're more vague. They never did the math, so they never made a real decision. They kept the status quo until the account was empty and the decision got made for them.

After October 2008 I kept three men. Not twelve. Not eight. Three. That number came from sitting down with a legal pad in my truck in a parking lot off Route 9 in Shrewsbury on a Thursday afternoon, running what my service-only revenue could actually support with zero new construction coming in. Three was where I kept landing.

I'd hired all twelve of those guys personally. Letting four of them go in early 2009 — I'd have had more room to work with if I'd done that math in October instead of February. Waiting didn't protect anybody. It made the cut deeper, later, and more desperate. And I didn't have anything left to bring anyone back with in spring because I'd already burned through trying to avoid the conversation.

Loyalty showed up inside the math. Not instead of it.

Here's the other thing: not all slow-season keeps are the same, and this is where the working foreman question matters.

If the guy you're thinking about keeping can run three people, still gets dirty, knows your accounts and your processes, trains new hires without being told to — keeping him through a slow stretch is not a cost. Losing him is. I've seen shops cut the working foreman in January and spend April and May watching a guy with eight months in the trade take twice as long to do the same work. That's not trimming the budget. That's eating the seed corn.

If the guy is steady but you're the operation and he's just the extra set of hands — that's a different calculation with a different answer.

Know which one you have before you decide anything.

---

Worcester, Winter 2009

January 2009, I had three guys left and I still had one more than I should have.

I knew it by mid-January. The service-only work I'd pivoted to after the construction accounts collapsed was steadier than I'd expected, but it wasn't enough for four people. I was doing the mental math constantly — in the truck, at the kitchen table after Diane went to bed, in the shower. I just wasn't writing it down. As long as I didn't write it down, I could tell myself I wasn't sure.

I finally did it on a Tuesday morning, February third. Legal pad, parked outside a supply house on Grafton Street. Wrote what I had in the account. Wrote weekly burn with four guys loaded. Wrote a realistic revenue number for the next eight weeks based on actual booked work and what February had looked like the two years before.

Six weeks before I couldn't make payroll. Not six months. Six weeks.

I let the fourth guy go the next day. He was a plumber I'd brought up from apprentice, someone I'd personally put my name on for a job reference. That conversation was one of the harder ones I've had in this business.

But here's what I've turned over a hundred times since. If I'd done that math in October — when I first felt the work thinning, when the builder accounts went quiet — I'd have had three or four more months of cushion. I might have been able to bring him back by May, which is roughly when the phones came back to something like normal. Instead I let February drain the reserve, did the math in a panic, made the cut from desperation, and had nothing left to offer in the spring.

Waiting didn't protect him. It protected my feelings. That's horseshit dressed up as loyalty.

---

What You Do Monday Morning

Not next month. Monday.

Pull last year's January and February revenue. Actual dollars received — not booked, not invoiced. Pull your headcount for those months and calculate loaded cost per person per week. Stack them. What was your actual burn against your actual intake?

Do it on paper first. Not in QuickBooks. Not in whatever field service software your salesman talked you into. I don't trust an owner who hasn't done this by hand at least once. The software makes the numbers feel like they came out of a machine. You need to write "$1,800" next to a name and sit with it.

Run the survival test against your current headcount. If all new work stopped today, could you carry everyone on payroll to April? Not "probably yes." What's the number, written down? If you can't write the number, you don't have an answer.

Sort your guys. Working foremen and people with real institutional knowledge on one side. Guys you could rehire with a phone call on the other. The slow season should not cost you people you can't replace. It may need to cost you people you can.

Build an honest spring scenario. Look at your booked work, your signed contracts, what's real versus what you're hoping. Those are different numbers and they need to stay in different columns.

Have the conversation now if the math says you need to — not in February. The best tradesmen I've known respect honesty in October over an apology and a check in February. You don't have to frame it as a layoff. Tell him what the work looks like, what the winter looks like, and your best read on when you'll need him back full. Let him make his own decisions about his own winter. Don't manage him. Just talk to him.

The math takes twenty minutes on a legal pad. That's not the hard part. The hard part is being willing to look at what it says.

---

FAQ

If I let someone go in November, can I get him back in March?

Depends on the guy and the market. A solid journeyman with options will find work. If you handled November badly, he'll take the first steady offer he gets and he won't wait for your call. Your best protection is the conversation itself — tell him in October, be straight about the timeline, ask him directly if he'd be open to coming back. Good guys who respect you will usually tell you yes or no. You're not guaranteed anything, but a real conversation beats a surprise layoff.

What goes into loaded labor cost besides hourly wages?

Gross wages times hours. Then add employer payroll taxes — Social Security and Medicare on your side of the ledger. Federal and state unemployment. Workers' comp premium, allocated per employee. General liability per head. Health insurance if you're covering any portion. Honest per-truck operating cost — fuel, insurance, maintenance divided across the year. When I ran this at Smith Mechanical the burden consistently landed between 35 and 50 percent on top of base wages, and that was doing the math carefully, not guessing. A $28-an-hour guy is a $40-to-$45 reality. If that number surprises you, you've been thinking about payroll wrong.

How do I know if I'm looking at a slow season or a business that's shrinking?

Pull three years of January and February revenue and lay them flat. If the slow months are getting slower year over year, that's not seasonal — that's a trend. Seasonal slow means the phones come back in March and revenue recovers close to where it was. Structural shrink means the recovery gets smaller each spring, or it comes later, or it doesn't come all the way back. Most owners don't want to pull three years because they already suspect what they'll find. Pull it anyway. Knowing is better than hoping, even when knowing is worse.

Is there a version where reduced hours makes more sense than a full cut?

Yes, and I think it's underused. Some states allow partial unemployment — the guy works reduced hours and collects partial benefits on the days he's off. I've talked to two shops in Massachusetts that ran this through a slow stretch and held onto someone they'd have otherwise cut. It requires paperwork and it requires the guy to be open to it. The October conversation makes it possible. The February panic cut doesn't leave room for it.

How do I have this conversation with someone I've worked with for six years?

Don't give him a speech. Tell him what the work looks like, what the money looks like, and what you can honestly offer through the winter. Don't sell him on a March that isn't certain. The guy's been with you six years — he knows when you're reading from a script. Talk to him like Donny Ferraro would've talked to me: straight, no theater, let the facts do the work.

Does this math change for a bigger shop?

The math doesn't change. The stakes do. A three-truck shop carrying one idle guy through eight slow weeks is burning a third of its labor capacity. A twelve-man shop carrying two idle guys is a smaller percentage — still bad, but the reserve tends to run deeper. Where bigger shops get hurt differently is in the indirect drag. A foreman spending his week managing underutilized guys instead of billing hours. The guys who are busy watching someone else do nothing. That wears on people faster than you think. Bigger shops also carry more fixed overhead, so the break-even on billable hours is higher and a slow month hits the bottom line harder than the headcount alone suggests. Run the loaded math either way. The number doesn't care what size you are.